Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Woodward's "State Of Denial". Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Woodward's (2006) book entitled State of Denial delves deeply into the deception President Bush has repeatedly handed to the American people in his ongoing attempt to justify the war in Iraq. Woodard (2006) takes a strong stand against the current administration as working independently of what is best for the greater good, most notably the citizens of the United States; brazenly pointing out specific details that clearly illustrate how Bush has wholly manipulated, fabricated and outright lied - and continues to do so even now - throughout the course of this war in order to protect his own agenda. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCWoodward.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
takes a strong stand against the current administration as working independently of what is best for the greater good, most notably the citizens of the United States; brazenly pointing out
specific details that clearly illustrate how Bush has wholly manipulated, fabricated and outright lied - and continues to do so even now - throughout the course of this war in
order to protect his own agenda. What is most intriguing about Woodwards (2006) expos? is the manner by which it exemplifies the tremendous rift between and among White House
hierarchy to the point where the Secretary of Defense was one of the wars biggest opponents. Another enlightening political tidbit Woodward (2006) provides is how the turning point Bush
claimed in 2006 had occurred toward the retreat of terrorism was blatant propaganda in the face of receiving a memo only days before that clearly advised how "insurgents and terrorists
retain the resources and capabilities to sustain and even increase current level of violence through the next year" (Woodward, 2006, p. 472). Woodwards (2006) attitude is unmistakably angry because of
the web of deception in which Bush has placed an entire nation of constituents who want desperately to believe his positive reports about a war that has the United States
too close to detrimental watershed. The integrity of a man like Woodward (2006) - who would place his own reputation, and perhaps even his physical safety, on the line
with such a tell-all book in order to inform the American people of what a fraud their leader is - reflects how he is no longer able to silently stand
by and watch Bush maneuver a war that both Woodward and Bush know should never have happened in the first place. The surface [of the book] reveals that we
...