Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Wisdom According to Plato and Socrates. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper examines the points of view for each of these well known theorists. How wisdom is pursued is discussed.
Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA616PaS.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
sects to becoming involved with mainline religions. Yet, in seeking truth and wisdom, some see it as something that is in need of boundaries. Should people explore wisdom with no
holds barred, or should there be limits? A student writing on this subject will want to look on how well known early philosophers looked at things. Plato and
Socrates each take different approaches as it respects the seeking of wisdom. For Plato, philosophy starts with wonder and looks for understanding (Kass, 2003). Yet, Socrates sees the search for
wisdom as being aligned with humility (Kass, 2003). For Socrates, humility would come before mystery (Kass, 2003). Here, it seems that for Plato, there is a relentless search for the
truth, whereas for Socrates, one must place reverence over that search. For Socrates, wisdom is secondary to knowledge for the sake of knowing. In some ways, the theorists think alike.
For example, here it seems that Socrates was enamored of virtue and while he supported truth seeking, it appears that Plato was much more vocal in this respect. Yet, the
Socratic method speaks volumes in relationship to demonstrating that the truth should be relentlessly pursued. The Socratic method is important to understand because it is supposed to produce truth
in the end. The essence of this method is a process that usually begins with Socrates asking a question such as "what is justice?" and after a definition is provided,
Socrates gets the interlocutor to make a statement that would obviously contradict the first answer (Dunkle, 1986). The interlocutor then changes the original definition, which is actually closer to the
truth, but is shown by Socrates to be faulty (Dunkle, 1986). This process is repeated until an acceptable definition is reached or it is thought that it is not profitable
...