Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on What Should Japan do Now?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 10 page paper discussing the impasse at which Peru and Japan have arrived concerning extradition of Peru’s former president Fujimori, who Peru has charged with gross corruption and crimes against humanity. Fujimori was born in Peru of parents who had immigrated from Japan. They registered his birth, resulting in dual citizenship. Japan refuses to extradite based on Fujimori’s citizenship status plus the fact that it has no extradition treaty with Peru. The paper reviews the significance of the issue, the various arguments from both sides and provides a list of possible alternatives, including deferring to an international mediator for resolution. Bibliography lists 12 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSperuJapanFuji.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Peru have reached impasse on the issue of former Peruvian president Fujimoris extradition to Peru to face a variety of civil and criminal charges. The two nations already have
learned that neither of them is likely to change any official stance. A better course of action now likely is that of soliciting the involvement of an outside party.
Significance of the Issue Legal Aspects In 1990, Japan extradited to the United States a former Nicaraguan diplomat "on suspicion of smuggling heroin
into that country by making use of his diplomatic immunity" (Japan to extradite former Nicaraguan diplomat to U.S., 1990; p. K901015060). William Tapia had been a senior counselor at
the Nicaraguan embassy in Tokyo when the United States determined it had a case against him for smuggling more than two kilograms of heroin into the United States from Thailand.
Tapia had maintained his innocence throughout, but despite his objections the Japanese government detained him on July 17, 1990. The Japanese government
conducted its own investigation after receiving the US complaint and the charges against Tapia, not announcing its decision to extradite Tapia to the US until October that same year.
Even after determining as a result of its own investigation that there was reason to suspect Tapia of direct and concerted wrongdoing, the basis for Japans action in extraditing Tapia
hinged on a pre-existing extradition treaty between Japan and the United States (Japan to extradite former Nicaraguan diplomat to U.S., 1990). The relevance
of the Tapia case to that of Fujimori is that Japan does have means of extraditing individuals to nations wishing to pursue cases against them. The fact that Japan
...