Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Welfare Reform In New Jersey As It Relates To The Homeless. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
8 pages in length. Whether or not welfare reform has been beneficial to the state of New Jersey is not a question that can be answered with a simple yes or no. There are a number of variables that must be taken into consideration before an accurate assessment of such impact can be made. One positive aspect of welfare reform, also called the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996, has been that it has set a precedent for encouraging otherwise nonproductive members of society to become more instrumental in their own well-being. The writer discusses New Jersey welfare reform as it relates to the homeless. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_WelfrNJ2.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
of variables that must be taken into consideration before an accurate assessment of such impact can be made. One positive aspect of welfare reform, also called the Personal Responsibility
and Work Opportunity Act of 1996, has been that it has set a precedent for encouraging otherwise nonproductive members of society to become more instrumental in their own well-being.
By not living up to the standards set by welfare reform, which is established on an individual basis by each state, single people and families alike are in danger of
losing their benefits. It does not take much, either, to find ones welfare benefits at stake: breaking rules, not finding work or "simply exhausting their benefits clock" (Anonymous, 1998,
p. 10A). Urging people to become less and less dependent upon the system has, indeed, helped the state of New Jersey in its ongoing attempt to stay ahead of
the game. II. HOMELESSNESS Unless things go differently than they did in 1980, when the welfare system implemented "substantial cutbacks" (Anonymous, 1995, p. PG), New Jersey may be faced
with even more than it anticipated with the current welfare reform. New York did not notice any immediate negative effects from the 1980 cutbacks, surmising that the program had
worked the way in which lawmakers had intended. However, it was not until nearly five years later that the consequences of such drastic reduction created a significant increase in
the number of people forced into homelessness. William Grinker, former Human Resources Administrator for New York City, said that poverty is enough for people to deal with without the
added insult of taking away government financial assistance. "People on welfare, for the most part, are scraping by. Theyre not doing well (Anonymous, 1995, p. PG). For the
...