Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on “Waging Peace: Israel and the Arabs, 1948-2003” by Itamar Rabinovich. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page review of “Waging Peace: Israel and the Arabs, 1948-2003” by Itamar Rabinovich. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: JR7_RAwgp.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
"Waging Peace: Israel and the Arabs" by Itamar Rabinovich the author attempts to examine history to see why they cannot seem to find peace, while also presenting situations and historical
events that could perhaps have gone differently and led to a sort of peace. The following paper examines the book and reviews two different issues, of historical importance, presented in
the book. The issues examined are the figure of Arafat and Oslo, and the collapse of the 2000 Camp David Peace talks. "Waging Peace: Israel and the
Arabs" by Itamar Rabinovich In the situation with Yasser Arafat the authors, in the conclusion of the book, long after they have examined many conditions and events throughout Arafats involvement,
indicate that one particular author, Karsh, argued how "Arafat had been seeking to establisha terrirtorial base on the West Bank and in Gaza since 1968, from which he would
be able to wage a campaign for Israels destruction" As such, so argues Karsh, Israel played into his hands with the Oslo Accords, thus leading to "the single gravest strategic
error committed by an Israeli government since the establishment of the state" (Rabinovich, 2004; 305). This is a very interesting statement, or assumption, and like any political theory, it
is not necessarily something that can be proved one way or another. It is, however, clearly a possibility. But, it is also not a possibility that Rabinovich (2004) really addressed
in the book. He states this saying, "These arguments are not supported by the narrative and analysis offered in this volume" (Rabinovich, 2004; 306). In this manner it is noted
that the author clearly offers opinions and theories that differ from his own, which is a very powerful way of writing a book, especially when speaking of history and political
...