Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Violence & Sex on TV. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 4 page research paper that examines the issues involved with the debate over sex and violence on television. The writer presents both sides of this issue, concluding that more stringent standards should be employed to protect children, but adults should control media content by refusing to watch sleazy, violent, low-quality programs. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khvsextv.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
of sex and violence to attract viewers cite numerous reliable scientific studies that document the harm that this type of exposure does to the minds of children. Additionally, critics of
the television and film industries deplore the cultural degradation that such programming symbolizes. On the other hand, attempts to censor or control the television or film industries have been met
with strenuous objections that argue that censorship interferes with the artistic rights of the creators of television programming under the First Amendment. Studies of the media have shown that
the marketing of movies, music and video games, with exceptionally high content of both sex and violence, has been a typical part of television advertising aimed at minors (Hatch 1).
The FTC has expressed particular concern in regards to violent films that are advertised during TV shows that are watched primarily by children (Hatch 1). But while advertising is a
concern, the principal focus of opponents of sex and violence on television is towards the programming itself. While there are some programs that "sensitive" and "family-friendly," these are countered by
those shows that are "dark and sodden or brutal and cynical" (Shales 23). The Fox networks "Fastlane" is a prime example of the type of show that
many viewers find objectionable. It has been described as "wall-to-wall violence scored to gratingly loud rock with the occasional soft-core porn scene toss in" (Shales 23). Critics castigate sitcoms,
as well, for providing poor cultural examples. For example, on several sitcoms during the 2002 season, critic Tom Shales observed "manly, macho fathers berate their sons for being studious, for
trying too hard at school" (23). Basically, these shows substitute vulgarity for comedy and glorify stupidity. In response to the low quality levels of a great deal of television
...