Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Validity of Forensic Science. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 15 page research paper that examines the validity of forensic science, which argues that traditional forensic techniques have never been proven valid. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
15 pages (~225 words per page)
File: KL9_khforsci.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
viewing public with television dramas, such as "CSI: Crime Scene Investigations," the public have been enthralled with the power of forensics to indicate those guilty of criminal acts (Murphy, 2007).
However, literature indicates that the illusion of validity conveyed by fiction are nothing but illusion, as many of the traditional methods and techniques of forensic science are of unproven validity
and the criminal justice system, to a shocking degree, has failed to keep faulty evidence out of the nations courtrooms. One study revealed that defective scientific evidence has contributed to
over a half of all wrongfully obtained convictions (Murphy, 2007). In contemporary society, frequently just law is dependent on good science; however, the February 18, 2009 report issued by
the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, indicates that forensic science, is not good science (Moreno, 2010). Furthermore, the NAS report
indicates that when the courts are confronted with forensic evidence, for the most part, the rulings that they issued are can also be evaluated as bad (Moreno, 2010). For the
last twenty years, it has been the hope and expectation of forensic scientists that the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. would revolutionize the courts and open the
way to widespread use of valid science within the criminal justice system; however, the NAS report indicates that this has failed to occur. In Daubert, the Court formulated a
new test for the reliability of expert testimony (Giannelli, 2010a). This ruling specified that in order "to quality as scientific knowledge," an inference or assert must be derived by the
scientific method" (Giannelli, 2010a, p. 513). A year after the Daubert decision was rendered, it was observed by Professor Margaret Berger that the courts had never required the various branches
...