Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Utilitarianism and the Distinction Between Persons. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page
report discusses the ideas of 19th century philosopher, John
Stuart Mill, who was certain that the highest normative principle
is that, “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote
happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of
happiness.” This is his fundamental principle of utility.
However, it does not address the issue that there is a very real
distinction between people and that one’s happiness is not more
valid than that of another. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_BWutipeo.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
However, it does not address the issue that there is a very real distinction between people and that ones happiness is not more valid than that of another. Bibliography
lists 2 sources. BWutipeo.wps Utilitarianism and the Distinction Between Persons for - March 2001
-- for more information on using this paper properly! Introduction to Utilitarianism The 19th century philosopher, John Stuart Mill was certain that the
highest normative principle is that, "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." This is his
fundamental principle of utility. Mill argues that moral theories are divided between two distinct approaches: the intuitive and inductive schools. To elaborate on his attitude regarding utility, the most fundamental
explanation of what utilitarianism is can best be stated that is when actions are in the correct proportion they promote happiness, when in the wrong proportion they produce the reverse.
Mill also clarifies the fact that by "happiness" he means pleasure both intellectual and sensual. However, he also points out that individuals have a sense of dignity which
causes them to prefer intellectual pleasures over sensual ones. He continues in his thinking to assume that the principle of utility involves an assessment of only an actions consequences, and
not the motives or character traits of the agent performing the action. Mill notes that: "If I am asked what I mean by difference in quality in pleasures, or
what makes one pleasure more valuable than another, merely as a pleasure, except its being greater in amount, there is but one possible answer. Of two pleasures, if there
...