Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on UK, USA And North Korea: Addressing Weapons Of Mass Destruction. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Ignoring for the moment the right to freedom of assembly, and restricting one's answer to the scenario at hand, the student may choose to outline collusion and defacing government property as offenses that may have been committed. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCUK_USA.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
was taken at a secret meeting that North Korea should be extensively bombed. A civil servant present at this meeting (who had, as is normal, signed the official secret
Act) secretly made a tape recording of the discussions, which was then sent to various newspapers. This led to massive protests against the UK Government, and a group of
people decided to initiate large-scale protest. The campaign literature they produced asked protesters to gather outside prime ministers office. Protesters were also asked to bring along with them
"anything that could be used to tear down the prime ministers office, cause as much disruption as possible and wreck the government." Ignoring
for the moment the right to freedom of assembly, and restricting ones answer to the scenario at hand, the student may choose to outline collusion and defacing government property as
offenses that may have been committed. Colluding, which is defined as a "secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose" (Merriam-Webster, 2001, p. PG), reflects the
involvement of the civil servant, newspapers and the group of people who "decided to initiate large-scale protest." Defacing government property, on the other hand, represents the request that protesters
bring along with them whatever destructive devises they deemed worthy of such a violent - albeit premeditated - act. While it may only appear to be an act of
vandalism or graffiti, the intent this particular group of people had to dissuade the violent action proposed for North Korea was, in and of itself, an illegal act that made
the destructive demonstration no better than the bombing it was attempting to stop. Even something as seemingly innocuous as paint and other permanent markings - if that was indeed
...