Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on U.S. Foreign Policy Reflected in Three World Newspapers. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper discussing the reports of three non-US newspapers, analyzing them for the manner in which they present the news. Canada’s “The Globe and Mail” reports facts that American reporters leave unsaid; Britain’s “The Guardian” blasts U.S. and British governments with equal enthusiasm without fear of any repercussions from either entity. The United Arab Emirates’ “Khaleej Times,” however, provides “just the facts,” irrefutable facts that can raise the ire of no one involved in the matter it reports. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSforPolNews.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
An Old English lyric common among English minstrels contained the words, "O wold the giftie giver gie us / To see ourselfs as ithers see us!" The three
world newspapers consulted here - Canadas The Globe and Mail, Britains The Guardian and the United Arab Emirates Khaleej Times - report facts, but in ways different than those generally
found among newspapers based in the United States. The purpose here is to assess observed differences. The Globe and Mail The story
selected from The Globe and Mail (Canada) differs from the other two in that it originates with the Associated Press, a U.S.-based news organization. The article focuses on the
Red Cross visit with Saddam Hussein, but also mentions Iraqi elections, a topic of the article from The Guardian, below. The news of
the Red Cross visit with Saddam Hussein also appears on CNNs website on the same day. Despite similarity of basic facts and general tone, there are some glaring differences
between the two in details. Both articles state that visiting Red Cross personnel received a note they were to deliver to Saddams family. The most notable of the
differences in the two accounts is that The Globe and Mails version states, "Mr. Hussein was allowed to write a note to his family, which will be delivered after it
is censored." The very notion of censorship strikes a raw nerve with most Americans, of course. It is interesting to note that
CNNs (2004) version of the same fact states, "ICRC representative Nada Doumani ... said Saddam had given the Red Cross a written message to his family, but wouldnt disclose contents."
...