Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Two Views of Immigration. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper examines the arguments of William Booth and Bill Clinton with regard to immigration. Booth believes immigrants are essentially bad for America while Clinton argues that immigration is positive. The writer argues that Clinton's view is more persuasive. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_HVBooCli.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
do about it. This paper discusses two views of immigration, compares them and argues in favor of the idea that immigrants strengthen the U.S. Discussion Reading the essays by William
Booth, a writer for the Washington Post and former President Bill Clinton, its clear that both speakers are in possession of the same facts and agree on such basic matters
as the numbers of immigrants coming to the U.S., the demographic changes throughout the country and the problems presented by the large influx of people. The difference between the two,
and its striking, is that Booth sees the immigrants as a threat and an object of fear but Clinton seems them as an opportunity and a reason for hope.
Reading Booths essay, one cannot help but sense both an underlying fear and a belief in white supremacy. Booth constantly bemoans the fact that soon whites will not be the
majority race in the United States, and when that happens, it will no longer be America, but some strange hybrid to which no one owes allegiance. He believes that there
is a new type of "white flight" occurring (the term refers to whites moving out of cities as blacks move in); now the whites that leave are not merely moving
to the suburbs but are leaving the area, even the state (Booth). This is causing what he sees as "the emergence of separate Americas, one white and middle-aged, less urban"
and another that is "intensely urban, young, multicultural and multiethnic. One America will care deeply about English as the official language and about preserving Social Security. The other will care
about things like retaining affirmative action and bilingual education" (Booth). Booth offers no statistics or proof of this assertion, only his belief that one group will be focused on what
...