Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Two Legal Questions. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
4 pages in length. The writer briefly discusses 1) affording rights to the accused to suspects in the war on terror and 2) whether the Supreme Court holds too much power. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLC2LegalQues.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
boundaries of a flawed legal system; that alleged perpetrators are protected under the Constitutions rights of the accused speaks to the nature of judiciary equity and expediency to prevent an
otherwise innocent person from being unduly detained. While it may seem odd that offenders have any rights at all, it is not those who actually commit the crimes who
receive these rights, but rather those who are mistakenly fingered for anothers transgression. According to the Constitution, all who are accused in criminal prosecutions will have the right:
* to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained
by law * to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation * to be confronted with the witnesses against him * to have compulsory process for obtaining
witnesses in his favor * to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence (Hornberger, 2005). The aforementioned criteria serves to protect
common citizens who have been accused of committing crimes within the norm of societal lawlessness; when the cause of criminal activity is spawned from terrorism, no rights should be accorded
to suspects captured in the war on terror. Terrorism is not an activity endorsed by global states as a means by which to address international hostilities; rather, it is
a self-perpetuating form of anarchy that feeds off a minimal percentage of fundamentalists who have the capacity to inflict tremendous harm and damage. The extent to which terrorists act
of their own accord is both grand and far-reaching; that their non-state status creates an even greater level of contempt and confusion speaks to the inescapable reality of innocent -
...