Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Unfairness of John Proctor’s Trial. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This is a 4 page paper that provides an overview of John Proctor's trial from the Crucible. The trial is critiqued on the basis of Constitutional tenets and rights. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: KW60_KFlit013.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the conduct of the trial itself, and the circumstances surrounding Proctors ultimate condemnation, numerous violations of Proctors Constitutional rights can be observed. In short, because the court did not handle
Proctors case in accordance with the legal guidelines of due process set forth in the Constitution, Proctors condemnation should be entirely invalidated and overturned by the court. This paragraph
helps the student demonstrate the unfairness of Proctors trial by showing how he was denied due process. The invalidity of John Proctors trial is primarily predicated on the fact that
both the charges levied against Proctor and the method in which the trial was carried out were inherently unfair. Constitutional law dictates that the state cannot legally detain an individual
without sufficient evidence to charge them with a crime, and furthermore, that an individual must be presumed innocent until proven guilty via due process. The concept of due process guarantees
the accused a court trial, conducted to fair standards, and overseen by a jury of the accuseds peers. None of these criteria were met in the case of John Proctor.
He was detained entirely on the basis of the testimony of one hysterical girl; this amounts to hearsay rather than evidence, and is an insufficient base upon which to press
charges in the first place. Moreover, Proctor was not granted the due process of a juried trial; rather, he was given an ultimatum to either confess to the charges and
tarnish his public reputation, or to maintain his innocence and be put to death as a result. In this way, Proctor was directly denied the basic rights assured to him
in the Constitution as a citizen of the United States. Proctors own proclamation, that he "cannot judge another" for he "ha[s] no tongue for it", is ironically much more in
...