Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Supreme Court And Campaign Finance: Infringement Upon Democratic Process?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
10 pages in length. When the Supreme Court of the United States initially placed restrictions upon the issue of campaign finances, the country cried foul with regard to constitutional rights. Imposing monetary limits on what political candidates could spend, said some, was going against the very grain of American freedom. Political contributions were getting out of hand, at which point a law was enacted in 1974 as a means by which to offset the notion of dirty politics by removing the one entity that played the most integral role: money. The writer discusses that while the issue of restraint is not, in and of itself, a negative concept, the idea of proposing limits based upon monetary consumption is a direct violation of the democratic system upon which this country was founded. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCdemoc.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
and bureaucratic rigmarole well enough to raise several millions of dollars for President Cartrights campaign. While he is keenly aware of the one thousand dollar limit that exists with
regard to individual and corporate contributions, he is also well aware of the alternative methods for finding campaign funds. Characteristically reminiscent of his past events, todays political soiree was
that of a ten thousand per person luncheon as a means by which to bolster the Presidents chances for re-election; however, he has not advertised this event exactly as such
and can, therefore, accept the nearly one-quarter of a million dollars the political party stands to raise at this sitting. When the Supreme Court of the United States initially placed
restrictions upon the issue of campaign finances, the country cried foul with regard to constitutional rights. Imposing monetary limits on what political candidates could spend, said some, was going
against the very grain of American freedom. Political contributions were getting out of hand, at which point a law was enacted in 1974 as a means by which to
offset the notion of dirty politics by removing the one entity that played the most integral role: money. While the issue of restraint is not, in and of itself,
a negative concept, the idea of proposing limits based upon monetary consumption is a direct violation of the democratic system upon which this country was founded. "You can sit
in Washington and say you dont know that participation and enthusiasm for the democracy has decreased because of the money pouring into it, but when youre out here in the
real world talking to senior citizen groups and to labor unions and to veterans groups every day and trying to mobilize them to participate in the system, I can tell
...