Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Scott Peterson Case. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4 page paper examines the prosecution's evidence in the Scott Peterson case, and argues that based on that evidence, Peterson should not have been convicted of the murder of his wife. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_HVPetrsn.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
verdict was unjust based on the case the prosecution presented. Readers Snap Judgment Using the articles on the Court TV web site, the reader has a chance to look over
the evidence / material all at once, instead of reading it in bits and pieces as it is made public, as those following the trial did. Doing so, one gets
the overwhelming impression that the case was decided by an over-emotional jury that was infuriated by Petersons infidelity and utterly disgusted because one of the victims was an unborn fetus.
The prosecutions case is beyond weak; its almost non-existent. But the jury was swayed by the raw emotion of the prosecutor and the judge, who nearly cried as he told
the jury about the little baby who would never take a breath or see the sunshine. Those of a cynical bent might suggest that an investigation of the judges views
on abortion would be in order to determine if he is an avowed pro-lifer; it might have been helpful if a committee on judicial oversight of some sort had restrained
the judge from summing up in such a fashion, which was tantamount to telling the jury to bring in a guilty verdict. Discussion Reading through all the articles
on Courttv.com reveals the way the attitudes of the people involved change as time goes on. Irregularities come to light and things seem odd. As the case gets underway, both
his parents and Lacis parents support Scott Peterson; once they find out about his infidelity, his in-laws turn on him viciously. Infidelity is reprehensible but it happens, and it should
remain a matter to be settled by those involved and no one else. The first strange thing we notice is that a column dated January 17, 2003, says: "Police
...