Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Role of George Washington's Leadership in the Revolutionary War. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper examines George Washington's leadership ability. it contends that Washington was ultimately responsible for the victory and not the incompetence of the British forces. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RG13_SA01137bri.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Revolution, there were mistakes made by the British, but were those mistakes enough for them to have lost the war? Interestingly, one might say that the British performed rather well,
even though a few mistakes were made. The British had a superior army. There is a suggestion that the British should have won. Still, it seems as if the evidence
that George Washington as a commander was unique is compelling. It was the leadership of George Washington, and not the incompetence of the British, that won the American Revolution.
There is a great deal of evidence to support the notion that Washington was an excellent leader. George Washington, the first president of the United States, is not usually viewed
as a good military leader. Thomas Fleming notes, for example, that many people today do not understand Washington and that this is because many military scholars ignore him (Tolson, 2008).
That is a good point. Few point to Washington for his military genius. At the same time, Ellis claims that while not a great strategist, Washington could see the
whole picture, and to his credit, he won the war (Tolson, 2008). Tolson (2008) defends Washington too. Tolsson (2008) claims that Washington was as a great leader and notes the
following: "Realism, strategic imagination, adaptability, and political savvy are all aspects of Washingtons generalship that more than made up for his tactical deficiencies, as a new batch of political and
military histories of the Revolutionary era show." An important thing that Washington did that arguably helped to win the war is that he
fought against John Adams who supported a volunteer militia; Washington recognized that a strong, regular army was necessary (Tolson, 2008). He was right. Obviously, this little factor would play a
...