Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Role Of Psychological Assessment In Clinical Practice. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 10 page paper begins with an introduction that focuses on the efficacy of psychological assessment. The writer then explains and discusses the different types of psychological tests/assessments, including the purpose and usefulness of each. In the final section, the write comments on validity, reliability, misuse of tests, and limitations. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MM12_PGpsyts.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
peaks and ebbs over the years. Historically, it was believed that medical tests, things like electrocardiograms, CT scans, MRIs, etc. provided the medical community with far more valid and
reliable data than psychological assessments provided psychologists (Daw, 2001). That long-held belief has now been empirically challenged (Daw, 2001). A Psychological Assessment Work Group (PAWG) reported: "Psychological test validity is
nothing to scoff at. In fact, when we look at the things we study relative to other domains, were doing a good job" (Daw, 2001). The Psychological Assessment Work Group
was established by the American Psychological Association for the purpose of determining the "efficacy of assessment in clinical practice" (Daw, 2001). Establishing this group was a response to two events:
continued controversy regarding the value of such testing and the decline in the number of psychologists using assessments (Daw, 2001). Garb (2000) reported many clinicians do not use assessments because
they "value clinical experience more than empirical research." Garb (2000) went on to say that some clinicians "are overconfident and do not realize that they are drawing incorrect inferences from
their experiences." The report went on to say the findings have broad implications (Daw, 2001). For one thing, many psychologists have simply believed the negative press about assessments, that they
are not as valid as medical tests, that the assessments used are not valid (Daw, 2001). As the report stated: "This report helps us debunk the myth that we lack
an evidentiary foundation" (Daw, 2001). The members of the Psychological Assessment Work Group used accepted empirical approaches in their study (Daw, 2001). They conducted a meta-analysis of reviews comparing medical
test validity and psychological test validity (Daw, 2001). The authors "found that both psychological and medical tests have varying degrees of validity and that validity co-efficients for many psychological tests
...