Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Philosophies of Richard Rorty, John Dewey, and Bertrand Russell. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page comparison of the insight into knowledge provided by these nineteenth and twentieth century philosophers. Russell’s philosophical viewpoint is grounded in science and the precept that their are certain common truths which stand regardless of time or place. Rorty and Dewey, on the other hand, content that historical circumstance impacts truth and our understanding of it. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: AM2_PPpragm2.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Richard Rorty, John Dewey, and Bertrand Russell represent three of the most noted philosophers of the late nineteenth and twentieth century. While Rorty and Dewey agree
on many premises of the sociological construct, however, Russell tends to take the opposite stance. Russells philosophical viewpoint is grounded in science and the precept that their are certain
common truths which stand regardless of time or place. Rorty and Dewey, on the other hand, content that historical circumstance impacts truth and our understanding of it. The
diversion of philosophical view which is characterized by Rorty, Dewey, and Russell is particularly interesting in regard to language and the importance of the individual.
While Russell hails from the nineteenth century Rorty and Dewey hail from the twentieth. To Russell there were certain universal truths which stood unchallenged regardless of
Although Dewey preceded Rorty in the philosophical literature, both of the men share astoundingly similar
views in regard to the importance of language and self in acquiring knowledge. Rorty, of course, was greatly influenced by Dewey. Each criticized the foundationalist approach advocated by
Russell. Rorty (1989, 87), for example, insisted: "that philosophical reflection in an attempt to
provide alternative answers to age-old questions simply are ineffective, that instead one should recognize ones own importance in the grand scheme of things and:
"put aside [undue philosophical reflection]" as it is only "an escape from freedom into the atemporal", and "an attempt to attain
...