Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Philosophical Debate Between Realism And Nominalism: How They Relate To Species, Genes, And Niches. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
12 pages in length. Ever since the tenets of philosophy came into existence, there has been an ongoing debate between the concepts of realism and nominalism. When one considers these two divergent viewpoints, one is quick to discern their repelling structure, inasmuch as no individual can allege to support both doctrines; clearly, one is either a realist or a nominalist – neither the two shall meet. The writer discusses the properties of nominalism and realism, as well as employs example work from Roger Sperry, George Herbert Mead, and George Berkeley in order to demonstrate the relationship of realism and nominalism to species, genes and niches. Bibliography lists 12 sources.
Page Count:
12 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCnomin.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
debate between the concepts of realism and nominalism. When one considers these two divergent viewpoints, one is quick to discern their repelling structure, inasmuch as no individual can allege
to support both doctrines; clearly, one is either a realist or a nominalist - neither the two shall meet. To contemplate the properties of nominalism is to ponder the
notion of individualism, since the two philosophies share a common denominator of determinability and inward composition. I. NOMINALISM To be unique within
a world of sameness is a quest sought by many people; however, it is by way of such an objective that one becomes labeled as selfish and intolerant of commonly
accepted methods. This negative connotation of nominalism - which is to maintain an independence from the norm - has cast an even darker meaning upon striving to achieve ones
own distinctiveness. Believing that man is inherently a selfish being who has limitless desires, and noting that there exists no common denominator between humanity and the rest of nature,
Durkheim would have clearly acknowledged that mankind stands alone in his endless quest toward nominalism, a concept he considered to be the reason society is its own opposing force.
Durkheim believed that although society had come a long way in its progression, there was still a great deal of room for improvement. Intensely interested in the sanctity of
the individual, one can readily surmise that he believed humanity is a "product of our own imperfect understanding of nature, of our ignorance of how to harmonize our activities with
the worlds script" (Nehamas 40). Mans anomic decline within the concept of nominalism stands conspicuously reminiscent of that which characterizes him as a
...