Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Patriot Act Violates the Fourth Amendment. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4 page paper examines the USA Patriot Act and the fourth amendment. After the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, Americans were ready to give up some basic rights, but now people are questioning the act. Fourth amendment rights have been threatened historically. This paper brings all of these concepts into perspective. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA723USA.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
in those words, but the USA Patriot Act to a great extent truncates the rights of the people, particularly as it respects the fourth amendment. The Patriot Act was introduced
after September 11, 2001 in order to make the United States safer. However, it is still controversial. In fact, not too long ago, a heated political issue that
cropped up was the secret wiretapping that is sanctioned by the president. Presently, the ACLU is trying to change the law because it does violate individual rights. President Bush claims
that the new flexible rules are necessary to close loopholes when it comes to counterterrorism efforts (Lichtblau & Risen, 2005, p.3). Even if that is true, it is hard to
deny that the rights of the people are reduced. The Patriot Act did answer the fears of the people that were high after the attack (Ramrai, Hor & Roach, 2005).
The most serious acts of terrorism under the rules would get the death penalty (Ramrai, Hor & Roach, 2005). How do the new laws fit into the existing structure?
Ramrai, Hor & Roach (2005) explain: "New anti-terrorism laws fit into a process of the state governing through the enactment of new criminal laws and by increasing terms of punishment"
(p.134). The legal response had been driven by the public fear about attacks in the future (Ramrai, Hor & Roach, 2005). To an extent, this is media-driven in a nation
that is fearful of many things. At the same time, the new harsher guidelines are clearly warranted, despite the fact that the government is, at least in part, responding to
an angry public. At the same time, many years have passed since the attack, and people wonder how long they will have to compromise their rights in order to live
...