Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Meaning of Bloomberg's 2005 Victory. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper examines the 2005 mayoral race and why Bloomberg won. The racial disparity in the vote is discussed as well. Bloomberg's agenda for his second term and campaign issues are ideas included in this look at an important election. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA546NYC.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the 9/11 disaster that put both Mayor Bloomberg and Mayor Giuliani in the spotlight. This is a coveted position and usually sees many qualified candidates. In the year 2005, Bloomberg
won this desirable position once again. He was re-elected by a comfortable margin. Bloomberg received about 58% of the vote while Ferrer got just 39% (Wulfhorst, 2005). It
is no surprise that Bloomberg won. Despite his popularity, he did have many critics and so people thought Ferrer had a chance. However, historically, it is unusual for a mayor
to lose a second term in New York City (Wulfhorst, 2005). To his credit, Bloomberg did receive acclaim for his handling of post-9/11 affairs (Wulfhorst, 2005). Additionally, he follows in
Giulianis shoes who was perhaps the most popular and successful mayor in the citys history. It is hard to compete with that legacy so Bloomberg has done a fair job,
despite the fact that some claim that he has done little for the city. In fact, Ferrer often remarked that Bloomberg spent too much time focusing on the Olympics and
other superfluous matters when there were real issues that needed to be addressed. Each of the campaigns had pros and cons. There had been many issues to crop up during
2005, inclusive of the bid for the Olympics. There was heated debated about a stadium to be built. Education and security were also significant issues raised. However, it seems as
if Bloomberg had lodged fewer attack ads than Ferrer and many people perceive negativity in a poor light. This is one weakness that Ferrers campaign is aligned with. Based on
one exit poll, whites voted for Bloomberg at 67% versus 30% for Ferrer (Janison, 2005). For blacks and Latinos, Ferrer actually got the majority of votes for each of the
...