Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Integral Relationship Between Weaponry and Tactics in Warfare. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
An 8
page contention that there is an integral relationship between weaponry
and tactics. It is a relationship which is evidenced, in fact, time and
time again in history and one which impacts both the nature and conduct
of war. Some of the greatest tacticians of all time would have been
solely ineffective without a complementing weaponry. Likewise, the mere
possession of advanced weaponry has proven itself inadequate in a number
of military encounters. The author provides numerous examples with an
emphasis on the Napoleonic era and the utilization of artillery.
Bibliography lists 10 sources.
PPwarTac.rtf
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: AM2_PPwarTac.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
In the face of an enemy who relies on both their weaponry and their tactics, war cannot be won by advanced weaponry alone. Nor can it
be won by a sole reliance on superior tactics. Indeed, there is an integral relationship between weaponry and tactics. It is a relationship which is evidenced, in fact,
time and time again in history and one which impacts both the nature and conduct of war. Some of the greatest tacticians of all time would have been solely
ineffective without a complementing weaponry. Likewise, the mere possession of advanced weaponry has proven itself inadequate in a number of military encounters. The number of historical scenarios which
can be used to illustrate this relationship is particularly impressive in regard to artillery. None, however, are more impressive than those which can be found in the Napoleonic era.
History teaches that the mechanisms of warfare have undergone an evolution which is practically lengthy as the evolution of man himself. While
many historians contend that during earlier historic times artillery was used in battle only as a support to infantry, which was considered the "queen of the battle", this was not
necessarily the case in all warfare. During the first years of this countrys history, for example, artillery was commonly considered only a support component of warfare (Hogg, 1998).
This was especially not the case in the Napoleonic era (1792-1815) where infantry dominated the battlefield. Artillery has, in fact, been a very strong component of warfare since its very
first introduction. The first time artillery was used in actual warfare was during the 1300s (Norris, 1999). The French used cannons against the English in 1450 (Burbeck, 1999).
...