Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Importance Of The Peaceful Settlement Of International Disputes Towards The Attainment Of Universal Peace. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
10 pages in length. The never-ending quest for global peace represents a dichotomy of approach: In order to achieve peace, people must die for it to become a reality. Moving forward into the twenty-first century finds the quest for global peace at a crossroads never before experienced in the history of the world; for it ever to occur, there must be a comprehensive move from all global communities toward nonviolent settlements of international disputes. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCPeace.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
peace, people must die for it to become a reality. Moving forward into the twenty-first century finds the quest for global peace at a crossroads never before experienced in
the history of the world; for it ever to occur, there must be a comprehensive move from all global communities toward nonviolent settlements of international disputes. II. STANDING IN
THE WAY OF PEACE Universal peace is elusive at best and wholly impossible at worst given the member diversity of the global playing field. Political analysts have effectively addressed
the idea of force as the primary element of global hostilities; inasmuch as force is the primary vehicle for political terrorists, it stands to reason that if the element of
force did not exist, there would be no motivation for battle. Then what are the components that compel such hostile behavior, and why have they not been subdued by
the twenty-first century? One need only examine but a few of the myriad instigators to understand how peaceful settlements of international disputes continues to represent such a tremendous challenge:
Nationalism, freedom, democracy and trust. Nationalism may have originally intended to draw people together, but many believe it has accomplished just the opposite,
proving to pull people apart who would otherwise have no reason to battle and divide what should be united a society. Critics contend it has not proven to embrace
the people in the way it may have originally been conceived; rather, it serves to create intensified hostilities among those who were previously amicable. Moreover, where it poses the
greatest threat is in its desire to dominate powerful states and people. For example, Balkan nationalism represents the kind that reflects the desire for a change in political and administrative
...