Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Implementation and Monitoring of a Criminal Justice Program. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper examines the criminal justice system and how change can be initiated. The reasons why the implementation of programs should be monitored are relayed. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA704im.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
once. The monitoring and implementation of new programs in the criminal justice system is something that is often done in conjunction. A program implemented and ignored will not work well.
Therefore, it is prudent to set up a plan to monitor programs even prior to implementation. The benefits of monitoring go to seeing if there is a gap between the
idea for a particular program and its actual fruition (Welsh and Harris 170). In other words, an idea comes about and a program is created. implementation is aligned with doing
things to put the plan into effect. Sometimes, certain portions work and certain parts of a plan fail. It is only through monitoring that one can see which parts of
a plan are effective and workable and which are not. In monitoring a program, there are several questions that need to be asked. For example, it is prudent to ask
what had been an intended goal of a project (Welsh and Harris 170). Obviously, one cannot measure success unless one knows what an initial goal had been. If one evaluates
a program based on the outcome, and does not know the intent of a project, the evaluation is not very meaningful. It is only through the attainment of goals that
one can truly know that everything that could be done had been done. Another question goes to data collection and that plays a role in the analysis (Welsh and
Harris 170). A student asks: "What are the advantages and disadvantages of collecting service provider data? " First, it pays to note that service provider data is equivalent to information
that a change agent or evaluator is able to glean from staff members directly (Welsh and Harris 167). For instance, instead of looking at service records specifically, one could ask
...