Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Impeachment Of President Bill Clinton. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper that introduces a topic for a longer paper. The topic is the impeachment of President Clinton. The first section provides some background into the case and the topics that should be discussed in a term paper. The second section discusses sources that will be used to write the paper. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MM12_PGclimp.RTF
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the President (Rozell and Wilcox, 1999). The President was accused of perjury and obstruction of justice in the hearings surrounding the lawsuit brought against the president by Paula Jones Rozell
and Wilcox, 1999). The subject of the issue was Monica Lewinsky, with whom the President was accused of having sexual relations. President Clinton was only the second sitting president
in the history of the United States who was impeached by the House (Miller, 2004). President Clinton faced the real possibility of being the only president removed from office by
the U.S. Congress (Rozell and Wilcox, 1999). It was a case that occupied the attention of the public for nearly one year (Rozell and Wilcox, 1999). Rozell and Wilcox (1999)
explained: What occurred over the course of the following year was as remarkable as it was unprecedented in American public life. A popular president during a period of peace and
unprecedented national prosperity possibly stood to lose his office over lying about a sexual indiscretion (p. 539). The reaction of the public was both divided and remarkable. Proponents argued he
did what any married man would do, opponents argued he had lied, i.e., committed perjury and obstructed the course of justice (Rozell and Wilcox, 1999). In one poll, one woman
made this comment: "I mean, if the grand jury sat us all down and asked about the topic, sex, how many people wouldnt commit perjury?" (Miller, 2004, p. 226). Still,
Republicans continued the name-calling, referring to Clinton as immoral, deceitful, and illegal and some went so far as to call him "a jerk" (Miller, 2004, p. 226). There was a
strange phenomenon that occurred during that time. Despite the arguments and the constant publicity regarding Clintons indiscretions, polls showed his job approval ratings higher in January 1998, which was right
...