Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Future of Human Cloning.. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
(7 pp) The idea of human cloning either sounds
like something out of a bad science fiction movie,
is a boon to medical science or a travesty to
morality. As in the case of most exaggerations,
there is a shred of truth in all of them. Although
our proposed challenge is to project what might
happen, some of those projections will be examined
under a humorous light. Generally speaking we
learn best when we can laugh. Other projections
are as assigned. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_BBclone.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
to project what might happen, some of those projections will be examined under a humorous light. Generally speaking we learn best when we can laugh. Other projections are
as assigned. Bibliography lists 6 sources. BBclone.doc THE FUTURE OF HUMAN CLONING Written by for the Paperstore, Inc.,
August 2000 Introduction The idea of human cloning either sounds like something out of a bad science fiction movie, is a boon to medical science or a travesty
to morality. As in the case of most exaggerations, there is a shred of truth in all of them. Although our proposed challenge is to project what
might happen, some of those projections will be examined under a humorous light. Generally speaking we learn best when we can laugh. Other projections are as assigned. Cross-Impact
Analysis Alter and Enzer (1978) claim that cross-impact analysis differs from both probability theory and mathematical statistics; a cross-impact analysis is concerned with the identification of possible outcomes rather than
with an understanding of what is or what was. They define cross-impact analysis as a systematic way to examine possible future developments and their interactions. History It has been argued
that cloning neither presents an entirely new set of problems which could not be resolved by traditional ethics, nor that human cloning deserves the condemnation it has received the world
over. Thirty-one eminent scientists and philosophers stated (1997) in a Declaration in Defense of Cloning and the Integrity of Scientific Research in The International Secular Humanist Magazine that
they "see no inherent ethical dilemmas in cloning nonhuman higher animals. Nor is it clear to us that future developments in cloning human tissues or even cloning human beings will
...