Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Federalist System of the U.S. and Urban Politics. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 6 page report discusses the relationships that exist between the federal government and American cities. Arguments against federalism claim that it infringes upon the rights of the states and therefore the rights of the citizenry. Such arguments are misplaced since a strong central government does not mean the loss of freedom and property rights and, in actuality, is needed to defend freedom and property. What is evolving as a greater concern in terms of federalist policy and concern is the issue of the role of the federal government in terms of urban issues, an area which had once been thought of as primarily the concern of individual states. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_BWfedurb.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
The idealistic goal of federalism is to effectively divide power between the federal and state governments to protect individual liberty. Arguments against federalism claim that it infringes upon the rights
of the states and therefore the rights of the citizenry. Such arguments are misplaced since a strong central government does not mean the loss of freedom and property rights and,
in actuality, is needed to defend freedom and property. What is evolving as a greater concern in terms of federalist policy and concern is the issue of the role of
the federal government in terms of urban issues, an area which had once been thought of as primarily the concern of individual states. "Pragmatic" Federalism According to Glendening
(2001): "Under the matrix of pragmatic federalism, intergovernmental relations are constantly changing, fashioned to address current needs while emphasizing problem solving with a minimal adherence to rigid doctrine" (pp. 7).
What this means is that individual states have a greater ability than at virtually any other time in modern history to determine and define their unique roles as part of
the republic (pp. 7). They are able to operate as partners with the federal government in three specific ways that Glendening outlines as partnerships related to: "fundamental human dignity; issues
that do not recognize borders; and issues where major financial resources are controlled by the national government" (pp. 7). Issues of human dignity cannot and should not change at state
borders, just as environmental concerns such as the results of polluting a river upstream in another state has a severe impact on those living downstream regardless of state borders. Furthermore,
financial resources that are based on federal monies are not more legitimate in one part of the nation over another. Recognizing such factors as the key governing concerns associated
...