Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Federalist Era: The Role of the President. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper examines the presidencies of John Adams and George Washington. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RG13_SA1133fed.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
important issues for the era because the nation was just beginning. It was relatively small and there was a lot of land to conquer. Further, in order to be successful,
a strong military would be necessary to ward off dangers from outside of the nation. After all, the new nation could easily be attacked if it was not strong enough.
As president, Washington did not impinge upon the powers of Congress ("George Washington"). In other words, he did not want to increase the powers of the presidency. In fact, it
is known that Washington wanted to make sure that his role never resembled anything close to royalty. For Washington, foreign policy was a priority ("George Washington"). While his advisors
had opinions on the French Revolution for example, President Washington emphasized that the United States should maintain a position of neutrality ("George Washington"). He noticed that during his presidency, two
parties began to strengthen and he warned against party loyalty ("George Washington"). For the nations first president, party politics was not desired. Washington stepped down as president after serving two
terms. John Adams would be the next elected president. Adams was not as well liked as Washington. He was criticized for national as well as foreign policy issues. For
example, Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts into law, something that made it difficult for foreigners to enter the United States of America (Sullivan, White, Weinberg, 62). Also, the
sedition acts would make it illegal to render criticism against the government, and some states claimed that it was unconstitutional (Sullivan, White, Weinberg, 62). They had a good point. After
all, the idea that people cannot freely speak their minds is associated with oppression. Of course, this was early on in history. It would not be until 1803 when John
...