Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Common Factors Approach to Psychotherapy. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page research paper that investigates a debate that is ongoing among mental health practitioners that concerns whether specific factors, i.e., the differences between therapeutic approaches, or their common factors, i.e., the characteristics that they have in common, are more responsible for patient outcomes. The writer argues on favor of common factors. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khwamp.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
behavioral therapy? Consult a Freudian or a Behaviorist? There is a debate among mental health practitioners as to whether specific factors, i.e., the differences between therapeutic approaches, or their common
factors, i.e., the characteristics that they have in common, are more responsible for patient outcomes. While the student researching this topic is encouraged to express a personal opinion on
this topic when writing his/her own paper, it seems to axiomatic to this writer/tutor that common factors the common factors approach to therapy is absolutely correct. In other words, what
makes a therapy effective or ineffective is the degree to which interventions incorporate the common factors that have been shown to be effective by empirical research. Bruce Wampolds
2001 text. The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Model, Methods and Findings, encompasses an extensive review of studies on the effectives of different treatment models. Based on this research, Wampold concluded that
empirical evidence indicates "overwhelmingly support for the importance of common versus specific factors" (Coady 15). Wampold states that "at least 70 percent of the psychotherapeutic effects are general effects (i.e.,
due to common factors (p. 207)" (Coady 15). There are a number of factors that are common across therapies. There is empirical support, for example, for the significance of
"encouragement of facing probl4ems/fears, support of efforts to master problems/ears, affective experiencing/catharsis" (Coady 15). According to Grencavage and Norcross, common factors can be classified into "five broad categories," which are
"client characteristics, therapist qualities, change processes, treatment structures and therapeutic relationship" ("A Common Factors" 1). The "therapeutic relationship or alliance" has been identified as "the most frequently mentioned common factor
in psychotherapy literature" (Coady 15). Furthermore, Karasu has indicated that all effective psychotherapies encompass three patient factors, which are "affective experiencing, cognitive mastery and behavioral regulation," and that all "major
...