Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Clinton Administration and Health Care. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 10 page report discusses the various health care initiatives put forward throughout the Clinton Administration, both the successes and the failures. The Clinton Administration has been decisively involved in health issues since its earliest days. However, most steps forwarded have been blocked or met with several steps back. Far too often in the past six years, it has been the administration's side that has been pulled into the mud puddle in the health care tug-of-war which has resulted in substantially less health care reform than President Clinton and his supporters had promised while campaigning. Bibliography lists 12 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_BWhplan.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
is ubiquitous in the political system of the United States. Polsby (1997) describes the system of checks and balances in the United States as "a process that discourages systematic, ideologically
based opposition, and reflects a strong bias toward the political status quo" (pp. 511). In the process, Polsby (1997) adds that the countrys political system also fosters policy making
that is ostensibly based upon broad, nonpartisan consensus. However, nowhere in government is the process more partisan, more contentious, and more problematic than in issues relating to healthcare. Health,
public health, and health policy are very serious concerns of virtually all Americans. The Clinton Administration has been decisively involved in health issues
since its earliest days. Certainly, the country got its best view of the scope of the Clinton Administrations vision of the potential for health care reform during the Administrations
first term and its ill-fated pursuit of a universal health coverage system as spearheaded by Hillary Rodham Clinton. As important as the incumbent
presidential administration is in terms of health policy initiatives and promotion of health care as a topic for national concern and legislative action, Harding (1998) points out that Congress plays
an important role in shaping U.S. health care policy. Of course, within Congress, individual committees play the lead policy-making role. Recognizing the dimensions and respective patterns has repeatedly pointed
out during the two Clinton administrations that that the power over health issues is a constant tug-of-war in terms of actually getting something accomplished. Far too often in the
past six years, it has been the administrations side that has been pulled into the mud puddle in the health care tug-of-war which has resulted in substantially less health care
...