Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Civil War Was Necessary in Order to End Slavery. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 10 page paper supports the view that intervention was necessary to end the institution of slavery. The natural limits thesis is refuted. The economics of slavery is highlighted and specific arguments are duly noted. Bibliography lists 11 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA211eco.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
an institution was still profitable and economically efficient on the eve of the Civil War1 . In no way would slavery have ended without the Civil War. The problem goes
to economics. Was the economic situation such that slavery as an institution would have simply died out? Or, would it have continued? The answer to that question provides a great
deal of information as to the validity of the Civil War. Although some say it was not fought for slavery issues only, the truth is that slavery and its abolition
was inextricable with wartime concerns. Still, the matter of economics looms large. In examining the issue of slavery and economics, it becomes clear that slavery was profitable, particularly for
the South. Although theorists have attempted to prove that slavery was a dying institution as it was not profitable enough, that assumption is difficult to prove. Also, the debate concerning
the Civil War is still viable. Was it fought for slavery, or was slavery only a side issue? During the time of the Civil War, the people were in disagreement
over the roots of the war (Richardson, 1999). Generally, Northerners blamed slavery as the cause but when the dominance of Southern leaders was overthrown by the election of Abraham Lincoln,
aristocrats in the South refused to accept the public will (1999). Southerners blamed the war on a Northern attack on the rights of states and after Lincolns election, Southerners
believed, as Jefferson Davis told them: " we are to be deprived in the Union of the rights which our fathers bequeathed to us.... " (1999, p. 396).
Davis had supported slavery and the rights of slave owners throughout his political career. At the same time, like Lincoln, Davis did not support secession. Yet, Davis became a staunch
...