Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Taxation & School Revenue. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page that summarizes 2 articles on school finance. Currently, as policymakers, legislators, and other stakeholders search for the means to meet the goals of the No Child Left Behind Act and achieve educational reform, a principal question that recurs is how public education should be funded. This examination of this question summarizes two journal articles on this topic that address this debate and how it addresses issues of taxation and school revenue sources. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khtaxsr.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
principal question that recurs is how public education should be funded. The following examination of this question summarizes two journal articles on this topic that address this debate and how
it addresses issues of taxation and school revenue sources. "Financing Better School," an editorial that ran in Education Week in 2005, begins by pointing out that far too frequently,
the traditional means of paying for public education has fallen short of school needs and there has consequently been an increasing trend to link expenditures on education to student performance.
Close to $500 billion in combined federal, state and local funds are expended on public education through the country, with close to half of this total coming from state revenue
(Financing Better Schools 7). As of 2005, 31 states were in the process of considering major changes in regards to how they finance education and allot revenue to school districts
(Financing Better Schools 7). As this suggests, the article establishes the presence of several trends in education finance. It shows how legislature and the courts have increasingly shifted their
emphasis from stressing "equity" to questions of "adequacy," as policymakers endeavor to determine precisely the costs that are involved in achieving educational goals (Financing Better Schools 7). Reporting on a
policy survey conducted by this journal, the editorial then relates how various states are approaching this problem. This shows that adequacy evaluations can differ widely between state-to-state, depending on how
these needs are calculated. For instance, 43 states and the District of Columbia include "weights and adjustments" in their finance calculations that provide extra revenue due to such factors as
"poverty, disabilities or lack of fluency in English" (Financing Better Schools 7). However, the way in which different states calculate these needs varies. A problem stems from the face
...