Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Tannen's "Sex, Lies And Conversation" Agree. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Declaring how "most wives want their husbands to be, first and foremost, conversational partners, but few husbands share this expectation of their wives," Deborah Tannen sums up in a single sentence what serves as the primary disconnect of expectations that exists between the genders. Her article "Sex, Lies and Conversation; Why is it so Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other" in the Washington Post clearly spells out the fundamental basis upon which relationships stumble their way to divorce: the majority of men have a communicative duality whereby they are more chatty in social and business arenas but practically closed down when in the comfort of their "caves," the precise place where women long for their mates to be talkative and verbally sharing. This conundrum, which is hard-wired into gender context, plays out daily at breakfast tables everywhere as wives who desire nothing more than to converse with their husbands are met with the backside of the morning newspaper as the "linguistic Battle of the Sexes" (Tannen) rages on. As the author duly points out, environmental influences based upon cultural indoctrination reside at the core of such gender division. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCtannen.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
serves as the primary disconnect of expectations that exists between the genders. Her article "Sex, Lies and Conversation; Why is it so Hard for Men and Women to Talk
to Each Other" in the Washington Post clearly spells out the fundamental basis upon which relationships stumble their way to divorce: the majority of men have a communicative duality whereby
they are more chatty in social and business arenas but practically closed down when in the comfort of their "caves," the precise place where women long for their mates to
be talkative and verbally sharing. This conundrum, which is hard-wired into gender context, plays out daily at breakfast tables everywhere as wives who desire nothing more than to converse
with their husbands are met with the backside of the morning newspaper as the "linguistic Battle of the Sexes" (Tannen) rages on. As the author duly points out, environmental
influences based upon cultural indoctrination reside at the core of such gender division. I believe these systematic differences in childhood socialization make talk between women and men like cross-cultural
communication...For women, as for girls, intimacy is the fabric of relationships, and talk is the thread from which it is woven. Little girls create and maintain friendships by exchanging secrets;
similarly, women regard conversation as the cornerstone of friendship...Bonds between boys can be as intense as girls, but they are based less on talking, more on doing things together. Since
they dont assume talk is the cement that binds a relationship, men dont know what kind of talk women want, and they dont miss it when it isnt there (Tannen).
Without realizing it, parents serve as the conduit between gender roles and this communication gap by verbally addressing their male children differently
...