Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Standard Based Precautions for Controlling Infectious Diseases. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper provides information on precautions suggested by the CDC. Financial considerations and how these precautions affect patient care are also discussed. Contact, airborne and droplet precautions are each explained in depth. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA311CDC.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
physicians (Strausbaugh, 1997). How are diseases for which there is no quick cure managed? Containment is perhaps the only thing that can be done to prevent epidemics until a patient
is no longer contagious. Precautions should be taken whenever any infectious disease presents itself, regardless of what type of disease. However, different diseases warrant different measures as detailed by the
CDC. Generally speaking, transmission-based precautions include airborne precautions, droplet precautions and contact precautions (Barrs, 2000). These guidelines are for patients with documented or suspected contagious pathogens and CDC guidelines
do list particular symptoms which indicate infection and suggest using Transmission-Based precautions (2000). Such precautions are temporarily implemented until a proper diagnosis is made (2000). It was in 1987
that the CDC recommended all hospitals implement infection control policies of universal precautions or UpS (Wong, Stotka & Chincilli et al., 1991). Under such a policy, health
care workers assume that the BBFs of all patients are infected and so should protect themselves with barrier devices if contact is anticipated (1991). While practical, such precautions are expensive
and a study estimates that these precautions costs facilities at least $336 million per year in the United States (1991). Such methods are theoretically viable, but there is actually no
evidence to support the claim that UPs will actually reduce the number of exposures that are sustained by health care workers (1991). The possibility however does exist that Ups may
actually increase certain types of exposures (1991). One example is that the use of gloves may interfere with tactile input and that is something that can increase the number of
casualties with sharp instruments that are used during procedures (1991). Additionally, if previous studies on compliance with infection control policies is true, health care workers should not adhere to suggested
...