Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper that explains what this act did for copyright protection. The paper discusses the pros and cons of copyright laws and whether they encourage or discourage creativity. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: ME12_PG690804.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
an entertainer and very much aware of what happened to the work of very creative people as soon as the copyright ran out. Initially, the copyright law extended to 50
years after the creators death, Bonos Act increased that to 70 years after the creators death (Keyt, 2007). It took effect on January 1, 1978 so that all work copyrighted
after that date held the copyright for 70 years after the creators death. There was an extension for works already copyrighted. If they had been registered or created prior to
that date, the copyright was extended to a total of 95 years from the date the work was originally copyrighted (Keyt, 2007). The purpose of the extension was to protect
the heirs rights to the work of their ancestors. Once the copyright ends, the work is considered to be in the public domain which means anyone can use that work.
It would still be considered plagiarism to copy directly from any work and pass it off as ones own creation, though, because those works are still in print. Even if
they are out of print, copies exist somewhere. In fact, a lawsuit was filed against the Sonny Bono Extension law claming it was unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected
the lawsuit in 2003 (Knowles, 2011). There are many people, in fact, whole organizations who oppose copyrights altogether; they think copyright interferes with intellectual freedom and free expression (Knowles, 2011).
Knowles (2011) argued that the Bono Extension Act did nothing but delay the time when all these products can be freely used by the public, thereby inhibiting cultural growth. Knowles
(2011) also argues that the original copyright laws were intended to enhance creativity because they provided the inventor or creator with protection. Their rights to their own work were protected.
...