Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Socrates and Machiavelli Compared. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4 page paper examines both of these individual's ideas. Some quotes are included. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA718SaM.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
one stand up for justice, or allow unjust events to occur? The idea that something is none of someone elses business is certainly questionable. Does one live life philosophically or
does one simply take the commands of the ruler? In delving through history, various theorists thought different things. For example, while Machiavelli believed in strong leadership, Socrates believed in a
contemplative life where one would weigh positive and negative aspects of their choices. Interestingly, Socrates never authored any books, but Plato and Aristotle certainly did and Socrates played a
rather larger than life character, creating his Socratic method that is still used to this day. In the Apology, Socrates is charged with corrupting youth and in fact, the Socratic
method which is related to getting at the truth, comes to life in this compelling work. In Crito, which is essentially a sequel to the Apology, Socrates is almost persuaded
that he should escape but in the end decides not to. Socrates does the noble thing in both plays. In fact, in all of the four named early works, it
seems that the theme is related to honor and doing the right thing. Morality reigns above all, and to some extent, the ends do not justify the means. It is
what a person does-his actual acts-that is most relevant. For example, in Crito, Socrates argues that he is setting a good example for his children by being obedient, even though
the law is unjust. This is a stance with which many would not agree, but certainly it is something that appears to be noble. Socrates was doing the right thing.
Socrates thought that his way of life-weighing good and bad, and living philosophically-was superior to the political life. He explains that the "wholly bad and perfectly unjust are also perfectly
...