Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Slavery & Economics In New Jersey / The Last Northern State to Turn. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page paper that considers the agricultural, economic, social and political reasons why New Jersey was the last Northern state to embrace the emancipation of African Americans, and provides a comprehensive analysis of the arguments presented by a number of theorists. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_Njslave.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Jersey was the last Northern state the embrace emancipation, and even following the introduction of emancipation into New Jersey law in 1804, many Africa Americans remained enslaved well into the
1850s (Hodges, 1997). Even after being granted their freedom, many freed slaves struggled against widespread discrimination and difficult sentiments based in the economic and agricultural conditions in New Jersey
that allowed the maintenance of slavery for many decades, and this can be linked to the large scale rural and agricultural segments in New Jersey, including Monmouth County, the center
of the anti-abolitionist movement in New Jersey. At the same time, a number of political issues, many of which were connected to monetary directives from agricultural communities, also limited
the pursuit and subsequent application of emancipation in this state. In 1784, United States President Thomas Jefferson introduced a law that would prohibit the growth of slavery, and when a
representative from North Carolina objected, a vote was called (Wardle, 1994). Under the existing Articles of Confederation, a majority of states had to approve of this kind of new
law in order for it to be enacted, and because there were 13 states at the time, 7 states votes were needed for the proposal to become law (Wardle, 1994).
Though one representative from New Jersey was present and voted for the measure, the other representative, who was necessary to the process of voting, was "sick" and unable to
participate, and thus, one persons vote appeared to determine the continued spread of slavery over the next half century (Wardle, 1994). Though this was apparently not an obvious
decision making event that divided New Jersey from other Northern states, it would certainly come into view again years later as theorists have tried to piece together the events that
...