Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Samuel P. Huntington's "The Clash Of Civilizations": Critiques. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
16 pages in length. While popular in virtually every political circle, Samuel P. Huntington's The Clash of Civilizations is not supported by everyone who reads the author's sometimes-scathing and judgmental assertions of global cultural discord. The writer provides Islamic critiques of his thesis, as well as discusses various issues that relate to cultural discord, such as nationalism and the Islamic Jihad. Bibliography lists 16 sources.
Page Count:
16 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCclash.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
that relate to cultural discord, such as nationalism and the Islamic Jihad. Bibliography lists 16 sources. TLCclash.rtf SAMUEL P. HUNTINGTONS "THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS": CRITIQUES
by (c) October 2001 paper properly! I. INTRODUCTION/CRITIQUES "For peoples seeking identity and reinventing ethnicity,
enemies are essential, and the potentially most dangerous enmities occur across the fault lines between the worlds major civilizations" (Huntington, 1998, p. PG). While popular in virtually every political
circle, Samuel P. Huntingtons The Clash of Civilizations is not supported by everyone who reads the authors sometimes-scathing and judgmental assertions of global cultural discord. Lebanese-born Shiite and Johns
Hopkins professor Fouad Ajami takes exception to Huntingtons (1998) broad brush approach to the overwhelming ethnic condemnation he puts forth in his book. According to Ajami, who openly spoke
of his feelings in a 1993 issue of Foreign Affairs, "the world of Islam divides and subdivides. The battle lines in the Caucasus ... are not coextensive with civilizational
fault lines. The lines follow the interest of states. Where Huntington sees a civilizational duel between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the Iranian state has cast religious zeal ... to
the wind ... in that battle the Iranians have tilted toward Christian Armenia" (Kaplan, 1997, pp. 269-270). Dokhi Fassihian. a graduate of John
Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, critiques Huntington (1998) by recognizing the extent to which his thesis is rejected by scholars and intellectuals but readily embraced by politicians. With
the importance of international relations of utmost concern in contemporary society, Fassihian (1998) cites globalization as an integral component of where Huntington (1998) fails to win his argument. "Put
...