Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on SELF-ANALYSIS LEADERSHIP STYLE: A TUTORIAL. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 12-page paper analyzes a student's leadership qualities by presenting theories of leadership and organizational management. Then this tutorial takes the student through 12 self-assessment points, and based on leadership style and the self-assessment, determines future goals. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
12 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_MTleatut.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
structure that style would fit into, and finally, how that style would fit in with future goals. Any paper needs a strong beginning,
and this beginning should probably focus on the goals of the paper, which would likely involve describing why the paper is being written, the format of the paper, the description
of the paper and finally, the conclusion. A Discussion about Leadership Styles Before analyzing his or her own leadership style, it might be
helpful for the students to examine and present general leadership style models to help contrast his/her style with the general model. As can be expected, business theorists over the years
have developed a great many leadership style models and have attempted to analyze which is the "best" model, depending on trends in business and human resources.
Perhaps the best-known leadership model -- and certainly the oldest one in existence -- is the classical leadership model (Crawford and Brungardt, 2000). The basis of
the classical leadership model is production and in and profit at all costs, no matter how hard such a concept might be on the workers (Crawford and Brungardt, 2000).
Classical leaders tended to view the end as the ultimate goal, rather than focusing on the means to the end (Crawford and Brungardt, 2000). For the classical leader, stability
is the key to success, with change regarded as something that is disruptive in the workflow, and something that can lead to more errors and problems in getting results and
stabilizing profit (Crawford and Brungardt, 2000). Classical leaders believe they have the right to lead and as a result, they take their authority seriously, making decisions, confronting issues and
...