Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Roman Imperialism/3 Views. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 16 page research paper/analysis that examines 3 history books. This discussion examines three books on Roman imperialism that are all extensively researched (using both primary and secondary sources) and well written, and two of which contradict each other on some basic points. An analysis of these books shows the importance of consulting more than one source or authority before forming an opinion on any issue. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
16 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_kh3hisb.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
problematic in this scenario--when it comes to investigating ancient history--is that quite often scholars disagree on how to interpret events and, particularly, on what were motivations behind ancient cultures. This
is particularly true concerning the topic of Roman imperialism, which has garnered a great deal of scholarly attention from historians. The following discussion examines three books on Roman imperialism that
are all extensively researched (using both primary and secondary sources) and well written, and two of which contradict each other on some basic points. An analysis of these books shows
the importance of consulting more than one source or authority before forming an opinion on any issue. Badian: Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic E. Badian in his text
Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic charts the evolution of the Roman imperialism, showing how Romes ambitions changed over time.i It is a fascinating dissertation that explains how Rome moved
from a strict policy of non-annexation to one that saw annexation and empire as expedient means to achieving political purposes. Badian begins his argument by pointing out that imperialism is,
from a certain point of view, as "old as the human race, or at least as its social organization."ii In other words, Badian feels that the imperialism, that is, the
"extension of power by ones own group over others," is basic to human nature and "does not call for special explanation.iii One sees the same urge in the delight of
football fans over teams victory, as well as in the Ciceros proud references to the "glory and the victories" of Rome.iv What does call for special explanation is when
a government rejects the chance for an extension of power. He argues that when this occurs it constitutes a sign of sophistication, as it indicates "overcoming the deep-seated urge for
...