Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Role Of District Attorney In Criminal Justice. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 7 page paper that discusses what a district attorney or prosecutor does. The district attorney’s role is pivotal in the criminal justice system. The paper reports activities in which the prosecutor is involved and comments on how easy it is for the district attorney to abuse the vast power they have. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: ME12_PG690752.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
prosecutor refers to the lawyer who actually prosecutes the case for the state and could be the district attorney or an assistant district attorney. The district attorneys primary role
is to represent the government, or said another way, to represent the state (Read, 2009). District attorneys usually believe that their client is society itself and will also often state
that they represent the victims of crime in bringing justice. The prosecutor in any criminal court case is a public official who must determine what is in the publics interest
in bringing charges and prosecuting any given case (Lynch, 2011). The district attorneys role in the criminal justice system is pivotal because it is this person who decides whether
or not to prosecute and what charges will be prosecuted. District attorneys have broad prosecutorial discretion. The law gives prosecutors almost absolute power to bring criminal charges against someone, what
those charges will be (Lynch, 2011). They rely on the evidence collected in the case to make these determinations. Abuse of these discretionary powers is not unheard of. It happens
too often, according to Banks (2009). There are no punishments for prosecutors who bring charges against an individual and later drops them. Meanwhile, that person has suffered a loss of
reputation, sometimes loss of their job, extreme emotional and psychological distress and extreme anxiety (Banks, 2009). Prosecutors are supposed to charge an individual only if there is probable cause
and a reasonable belief that this person actually committed the crime (Banks, 2009). There are no controls at all over prosecutors when it comes to charging a person with a
crime. Researchers have reported that decisions to prosecute are almost automatic regardless of the strength of or lack of evidence or the seriousness of the crime (Banks, 2009). Their power
...