Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Research for a Charity. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 12 page paper shows the student how to design a questionnaire to assess how and why employees at a company support charitable work and the types of charity they support. A sample questionnaire is provided and fictitious results are analysed to demonstrate a simple analysis. The bibliography cites 20 sources.
Page Count:
12 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TS14_TEcharitques.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
charity name in order to support increased fund raising. The charity also needs to increase the funds raised, specifically in the north of Scotland. The next stage is for primary
research to be conducted. This is to take place with questionnaires and is targeted at employees in a company where there is corporate culture of social responsibly. The aim of
the research is to identify the motivations behind charitable activities such as fund raising and donation and identify the key factors that will help trigger support for various charities.
One the questionnaire is written the answers can be correlated. This paper will demonstrate how a questionnaire can be written and then speculate with some fictitious results in order to
demonstrate who these can be put together in a final paper. The Questionnaire When writing a questionnaire the goals need to be clearly identified, the design should be aimed
at producing objective, reliable and repeatable results if there is to be value to the findings when they are applied to aspects such as the later strategy formulation. Reliability
may be perceived as one of the easier objectives. This is often seen as the ability of the same study to be conducted and the results to prove the same,
however repeatability does it mean that a research project is valid and can be relied upon (Smith et al, 1986, Denzin, 1978). If a questionnaire is flawed and is
then repeated with that same flaw then the same results may be seen, but the results may be erroneous (Rugg and Petre, 2004). We may argue we can rely on
these results in that specific set of circumstances, but the actual accuracy of the results is not proven. Therefore we must consider the other aspects of the research rather that
...