Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Rentokil; A Stakeholder Analysis. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 7 page paper undertakes a stakeholder analysis of Rentokil Initial. Stakeholders considered include shareholders, employees including Clive Thompson, customers and suppliers, competitors and anyone who feels the impact of the company’s influence on the environment. The bibliography cites 7 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TS14_TErentok.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
in hygiene, security, delivery of parcels, management and conferencing facilitates (Rentokil, 2002). An organisation of this size has many stakeholders both direct and indirect. In undertaking a stakeholder analysis, the
wide range of stakeholders needs to be considered. Direct stakeholders will include the employees, management, suppliers and customers as well as the
shareholders. If a stakeholder analysis is to be conducted, these parties need to be considered. However, there are also wider groups of stakeholders that are often forgotten as they are
not directly involved. These may include special interest groups, those living near the operations, either those carried out for customers, or the companys own production. These people may be effected
by waste or transportations. Indeed, the category my be broadened out so practically everyone is a stakeholder or some sort as there is the potential for them to be effected
by the company and its operations. The primary stakeholders are the shareholders. The main purpose of any commercial enterprise is usually to
make profit, and Rentokil is no different. The company was founded 80 years ago with the intention of making a profit, and this still remains. Indeed, it was in the
pursuance of profit that a restructuring occurred in 2000 following a profits warning in 1999 (The Financial Times, 2002). The desire to satisfy profit needs resulted in the company impacting
on other stakeholders, both employees and customers, with the disposal of some none core operations. These were the less profitable as they gave the company 30% of its turnover but
only 20% of its profit (Rentokil, 2002). This increased the opportunity for better and more profitable investments. Other acquisition have also been made, with a history of making over 300
...