Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Relationship Between the U.S. Constitution’s First and Second Amendments and Political Issues of Protecting Information Sources, School Prayer, and Gun Control. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
In five pages this paper examines the relationship between the first two constitutional amendments and three current controversial political issues. Four sources are listed in the bibliography.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TG15_TGamendments.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
studied or argued than the First and Second Amendments (Articles I and II). These addressed issues the Founding Fathers obviously felt most strongly about, hence their prominent position within
the text that continues to shape the American judicial system. These amendments in particular have as many detractors as supporters, for there are those who believe their relevance has
diminished over time and should perhaps be reworded to be more applicable to contemporary situations. However, constitutional purists believe that the words themselves are open-ended to invite interpretation, and
therefore should remain as written. The relationship between the First and Second Amendments and contemporary issues is clearly evident in current hotly contested topics such as the protection of
information sources (by members of the press), school prayer, and gun control. The U.S. Constitutions First Amendment declares, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances" (The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America, 1979, p. 31). Initially, freedom of the press and freedom of speech were
considered closely related, but in recent years the print media has suggested this implies they have the right to protect the confidentiality of their sources of information to protect the
integrity of the journalism profession (Nestler, 2005). In July of 2005, Judith Miller, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist for The New York Times, began a three-month jail sentence for her
refusal to reveal a confidential sources identity during her testimony before a federal grand jury (Nestler, 2005). In so doing, Ms. Miller sent out a clear message that she
...