Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Red Light Cameras: Policy Argument. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
10 pages in length. A combination of unconstitutionality, profiteering and Orwellian implication has both civil rights leaders and the general public incensed over the newest technological appliance to help catch traffic signal speeders: red light cameras. The concept is reasonable in theory, however, when theory became reality, people began to realize just how much of a Big Brother issue this particular type of surveillance actually is. As well, the strong motive to generate tickets for profit, along with the obvious potential for camera malfunction, has presented the entire aspect of red light cameras a questionable – if not suspect – approach to maintaining an orderly commute. Bibliography lists 10 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCRedCm.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
light cameras. The concept is reasonable in theory, however, when theory became reality, people began to realize just how much of a Big Brother issue this particular type of
surveillance actually is. As well, the "strong motive to generate tickets for profit" (Alvord, 2001, p. PG), along with the obvious potential for camera malfunction, has presented the entire
aspect of red light cameras a questionable - if not suspect - approach to maintaining an orderly commute. "There is a growing debate about red-light cameras vs. privacy and
technology vs. the Constitution and it is creating some unexpected political partnering on Capitol Hill" (Matthews, 2001, p. PG). II. ISSUES AT HAND Statistical findings from the International Association
of Chiefs of Police (IACP) indicate that over sixty communities nationwide have implemented red-light camera systems as a means by which to catch motorists who speed through traffic signals without
having a law enforcement officer present (Zalud, 2001). While still more research has proven the positive impact of such cameras upon reduced speed-related accidents, the overwhelming cries of unethical
profiting, unconstitutional activity and Big Brother observation have served to all but invalidate any associated benefits. According to Jim Fotis, Executive Director of the Law Enforcement Alliance of America
(LEAA), "Law enforcement officers depend on the trust and support of the community they protect. When police are perceived as being part of the big brother scheme that these
cameras represent, their relationship with the law abiding citizens of the community is damaged" (Zalud, 2001, p. PG). Part of the constitutional challenge of red light cameras is the fact
that many states deny motorists any opportunity to appeal the automatic ticket. With so many variables at stake, such as the car being operated by someone other than the
...