Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Rationalists Versus Empiricists. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. Rationalists maintain that humanity's knowledge of the external world (if any) is not justified solely upon the basis of input received from the senses; empiricists, in contrast, maintain that mankind's knowledge of the external world (if any) is justified solely upon the basis of input received from our senses. Examining Descartes' rationalistic format as compared with Berkeley's empiricist approach finds that while both philosophers deserve worthy admiration for their conjecture, only one can be considered the most valid. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCrashn.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Descartes rationalistic format as compared with Berkeleys empiricist approach finds that while both philosophers deserve worthy admiration for their conjecture, only one can be considered the most valid. Bibliography
lists 4 sources. TLCrashn.rtf RATIONALISTS VERSUS EMPIRICISTS by (c) October 2001 paper properly!
Rationalists maintain that humanitys knowledge of the external world (if any) is not justified solely upon the basis of input received from
the senses; empiricists, in contrast, maintain that mankinds knowledge of the external world (if any) is justified solely upon the basis of input received from our senses. Examining Descartes
rationalistic format as compared with Berkeleys empiricist approach finds that while both philosophers deserve worthy admiration for their conjecture, only one can be considered the most valid. "Philosophy is
to be studied, not for the sake of any definite answers to its questions, since no definite answers can, as a rule, be known to be true, but rather for
the sake of the questions themselves" (Perry et al 12). Berkeleys Philonous argues that to be is, therefore, to be perceived - that
matter does not exist independently of perception. Inasmuch as philosophy is nothing other than the contemplation of wisdom and truth, Philonous surmised that those who have invested both time
and pains in its postulations should partake of a greater tranquillity of mind, a more significant clarity and testimony of knowledge, as well as harbor fewer doubts and difficulties than
those who do not seek its enlightenment. PHILONOUS: How say you, Hylas, can you see a thing which is at the same time unseen? HYLAS No, that were
...