Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Pros And Cons Of The Role Psychologists Play In Torture Situations. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. The first and foremost aspect that defines the ethical foresight of anyone involved within the medical field is the Hippocratic Oath, which states practitioners shall first do no harm, a pledge that is blatantly ignored when psychologists play any role in torture situations that does anything other than help the detainee. Inflicting torture as a means by which to elicit confession is highly unethical for anyone to be involved with, yet it is especially heinous when mental professionals have sidestepped this oath with such unprincipled behavior. Today's fearful global society will go to nearly any lengths in order to obtain intelligence that may serve to thwart imminent terrorist activity, however, some of these tactics call into question the intrinsic value of the Hippocratic Oath when it is so easily dismissed. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCpsychtortr.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
harm, a pledge that is blatantly ignored when psychologists play any role in torture situations that does anything other than help the detainee. Inflicting torture as a means by
which to elicit confession is highly unethical for anyone to be involved with, yet it is especially heinous when mental professionals have sidestepped this oath with such unprincipled behavior.
Todays fearful global society will go to nearly any lengths in order to obtain intelligence that may serve to thwart imminent terrorist activity, however, some of these tactics call into
question the intrinsic value of the Hippocratic Oath when it is so easily dismissed. Are there any pros to having psychologists play a role in torture situations, even when it
is for the perceived benefit of national security? As with all ethical decision-making, people have to weigh the alleged value of each side and come to a personal decision
as to its impact when morals are compromised. That an added component of industry ethics is incorporated into whether or not psychologists should be involved in such dubious activities
speaks to the obvious lack of any apparent pros for them to do so under the promise they are bound to under the Hippocratic Oath.
The decision-making theory of cognitive dissonance helps to illustrate the contrary role psychologists play when they participate in torture situations, inasmuch as the individual is plagued by two
conflicting thoughts about a single decision and suffers difficulty justifying one of them away when the topic is of personal importance or the conflicting thoughts are too great. What
might be considered as a do as I say, not as I do approach to rationalization, cognitive dissonance theory enables an individual to have an opposing opinion yet behave in
...