Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Productivity Measures Criminal Justice Agencies Compared To Private Companies. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Budgeting is the watchword of productivity in the private sector; companies are driven to control spending as a means by which to measure this vital component of success or impending failure. It is a logical assumption to consider this particular approach to productivity measurement spans the entire organizational realm to not only include private companies but public and governmental entities, however, the criminal justice system is well known for sidestepping the budget consciousness so prevalent in conventional commerce. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCprodmeas.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
success or impending failure. It is a logical assumption to consider this particular approach to productivity measurement spans the entire organizational realm to not only include private companies but
public and governmental entities, however, the criminal justice system is well known for sidestepping the budget consciousness so prevalent in conventional commerce. Lacovara (2003) delves deeply into this social
hypocrisy as he ferrets out the reasons why the Supreme Court -- perhaps the most appropriate representation of the criminal justice system - is not held to the same level
of economic accountability a their private counterparts especially when their coffers are well stocked and all too often unaccounted for. As the author points out, budget-conscious managers "strive to
improve their organizations productivity, generating more product, more efficiently, with fewer resources. In government, productivity is virtually irrelevant. Government agencies are spared the rigors of the market and
survive forever regardless of their efficiency" (Lacovara, 2003). Productivity measures determine how effective output is in relation to outcome, which compels private companies to constantly re-evaluate the amount of money
being siphoned toward a particular project compared to how well that project is producing its anticipated result. Supreme Court justices, Lacovara (2003) notes, do not abide by this same
economic equation; in fact, their productivity versus ever-growing taxpayer-funded resources more resembles an off-kilter see-saw where a brick sits on one side and a feather on the other. To
say the Court resolves a minimal number of cases despite the overall resources and expenditures associated with this particular criminal justice agency is to acknowledge how it "is not doing
much to resolve the important, workaday disputes of federal commercial law that it should be addressing" (Lacovara, 2003), a fact easily supported by the negligible output of eighty decisions the
...