Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Presidential Responses To Domestic Economic Conflicts: Impact Upon Popularity. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
16 pages in length. The primary objective of any presidency is not to make critical decisions based upon popular opinion, but rather to enact policy based upon the betterment of the nation as a whole, a task that is inherently marred with unpopular public opinion no matter how beneficial it may be. However, there is a fine line between disagreeing with a president's policy and opposing it to such a degree that it changes the foundation upon which that president is popular with his constituency. Two American presidents who experienced this ever-seesawing approval rating did so because of their respective approaches to domestic economic conflict; Hoover suffered the wrath of an angry public, while FDR basked in the glory of an adoring nation. Bibliography lists 15 sources.
Page Count:
16 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCPresResp.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
as a whole, a task that is inherently marred with unpopular public opinion no matter how beneficial it may be. However, there is a fine line between disagreeing with
a presidents policy and opposing it to such a degree that it changes the foundation upon which that president is popular with his constituency. Two American presidents who experienced
this ever-seesawing approval rating did so because of their respective approaches to domestic economic conflict; Hoover suffered the wrath of an angry public, while FDR basked in the glory of
an adoring nation. II. LITERATURE REVIEW As thirty-first president of the United States, Herbert Clark Hoover was faced with handling one of this nations most economically disastrous events: the
Wall Street crash of 1929. This occurrence during his first year as president set a grim perspective upon his administration, inasmuch as he was expected to accept full responsibility
as a result of his ineffective and unpopular policies. His popularity rating was not always so negative, inasmuch as his earlier political achievements had supporters counting upon his hat
being thrown in to the 1920 presidential election. Without question, character is one of the primary components to being an effective leader; while
Hoover possessed the courage and decency that so expressly demonstrated the lengths to which his character reached, Hughes (1999) notes how he ended up not being the material of which
strong and successful American presidents are made.1 The highest office in the land may not require one to be especially dazzling or witty, but it does demand the elected
official to have a significant amount of respectability that is easily conveyed to the public. Hoover did, indeed, have this very critical sense of morality, which gave considerable meaning
...