Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Political Debate Over Stem Cell Research: Republicans Versus Democrats. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. No differently than with any other issue where Democrats and Republicans fight doggedly to outdistance the other's argument to secure a victory, the debate surrounding stem cell research – an otherwise unlikely candidate for political debate – has not only come to represent a hotly contested topic between the two parties, but it has successfully moved some of the opposing Republicans into the staunchly supportive Democratic camp. Bibliography lists 10 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCStemCellP.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
- an otherwise unlikely candidate for political debate - has not only come to represent a hotly contested topic between the two parties, but it has successfully moved some of
the opposing Republicans into the staunchly supportive Democratic camp. A recent poll conducted by the Pew Research Center on the People and the Press confirming this unusual situation found
Democrats "were solidly in support, while Republicans were split -- just as they are in Congress."i II. AT ISSUE After President Reagan succumbed to complications attributed to Alzheimers disease,
Nancy Reagan stepped up her vehement campaign in support of stem cell research to help scientists address the potentiality of treatment and/or cure. As fast as she spread the
word about how beneficial stem cells - the undeveloped blood cells from umbilical cord blood - are for future medical research involving myriad diseases, President Bush - representing pious zealots
and right-to-lifers who contend the "destruction of embryos to harvest the cells as akin to taking life"ii - followed right behind her with fierce opposition stemming from religious and ethical
arguments.iii With that, President Bush placed severe limitation on how much money the federal government would contribute to the research, leaving public and state entities to bring up the
sagging financial rear end. Said Daniel Perry, president of the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, a Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group, "had President Bush opened the doors to
full funding of NIH to fund research on stem cells, I dare say we would not be seeing as much public funding as we are seeing today."iv As it is,
states like California, Wisconsin, Illinois, Connecticut and Maryland have committed to fund stem cell research in place of the federal governments financial holdout; however, even with the millions of dollars
...